January Review-a-Month: Tarbell Course in Magic
One thing I failed to mention in my New Year update post, was another Christmas gift I received: The Tarbell Course in Magic, which is an eight volume set of books on, yep, you guessed it, magic. Originally developed as a correspondence course in 1927 by Dr. Harlan Tarbell, the books cover most, if not all aspects of magic performance, from techniques and tricks, to patter and presentation.
The book’s first volume opens with a History of Magic, and I found this wasn’t a History of Magic as in tricks, as I had expected, but a History of Magic as in healing, miracles and religion, this was slight disappointment, as I was looking forward to learning about those who had come before me, such as the Ancient Egyptian magician Dedi, and the father of modern conjuring, Jean Eugene Robert-Houdin, but c’est la vie.
The second chapter was better by far, explaining the scientific approach to magic, covering topics such as professionalism, and emphasising the importance of practice. This chapter was exactly what I needed, a thorough explanation on performing to the best of my ability.
The books then go on to explain tricks and techniques with coins, cards, handkerchieves, thimbles and a whole host of other objects, occasionally pausing to cover things such as routining and publicity.
All in all, the books are comprehensive and incredibly practical, with illustrations to guide you all the way, and in-depth, written explanations too, and while the book may not make you a guru on any particular aspect of magic, it gives you a thorough grounding for you to then expand your knowledge in any area you wish.
I would recommend these books to anyone who is serious about magic, and although they are expensive, they are well worth it.
Interesting digression: Seeing as how these are non-fiction books, I can’t really give incredibly extreme, close-minded opinions for you to disagree with, or talk about character development and interesting plot twists, but seeing as how this review is a first for me, I wanted to do something that deviates from “Bog-standard FPS review #3.”
Score: 8/10